Tag Archives: twitter





Sunday morning.  In the half light of dawn I awoke to screetching tires and a muffled thunk and an anxious silence that should have been filled by my car alarm.

Newspaper Guy takes the corner at the end of our street on two car wheels and races by our house with the urgency of a man on a singular paper routemission.  On most days he has a partner who leans out the window and fires the morning paper across the lawn and into our driveway, slicing of a row of agapanthus at the bud.  Newspaper Guy is not a 14 year-old kid with a paper route.  He is a full grown adult who drives a Cooper and delivers his morning news with a cold disaffection for how it is to be consumed.

We are the last house he delivers to so when he finally lets the San Diego Union-Tribune fly toward our driveway, it’s for all he’s worth.  Today the thick Sunday paper hit my Armada square in the tailgate at full velocity (plus additional “english” generated by  the forward lean of a speeding Cooper).  

It should have set the car alarm off but it didn’t.  If you hit my car hard enough with softball it will go off.  Hit it with the morning newspaper it won’t.  And I think I know why.   Here’s my theory:  there isn’t enough weight in the daily paper to do any damage; there isn’t enough substance. It’s air.  You can throw it in the rose bushes if you want to.  Throw it against the hummingbird feeder. Throw it right through the freakin’ window for all I care.  Nothing breaks. 

At my house, none of us actually read the morning paper anymore.  But we subscribe to it… for three totally practical reason:  first, it comes with a rubber band wrapped around it and those are always handy devices for binding stuff. Second, it comes inside a plastic bag which I use when I clean up after our dogs. And third… it is an effective way to stoke a fire in our fire pit (though, quite honestly,  I am gradually moving more to the Duraflame firestarters.  Less ash.)

The morning paper definitely has some utility but what is not so good for is news. Not anymore.


Just two weeks ago, for example, I followed the development of the Iranian uprising– from the very beginning– on Twitter.  [It was dramatic to follow events unfolding in real time.  Many of the contributors to the Twitter stream were front-line participants in a moment of history.  It was a day and a half before the story really picked up in the SD Union Tribune. Was there some fiction in the Tweets? spin? hyperbole? false reporting? sensationalism?  Of course. But no more so than one might find in the editorial section of any local newspaper!]

And I haven’t replaced the morning newspaper with Twitter alone.

To follow President Obama’s daily challenges or to sample a cross-section of American culture I read the  Huffington Post.

To follow the very latest events in K-12 public education, especially with charter schools,  I subscribe to Education Week on-line and read from my laptop.

If I missed an event like an epic, come-from-behind win by the Padres… I download the replay of the most significant plays on You Tube. The rest of the scores I get from MLB.com,  with the depth and details of teams I am most interested in.

If I want to read opinions from regular, everyday folks I read their blogs.

If I want some good, honest feedback and recommendations about books I might want to read, I browse through reviews written on Amazon.

If we want to publish “accurate” information about an event at my school,  we don’t call reporters and wait for them to come cover the good things we are doing anymore.  We just place the story on our school’s Facebook page.

If we want to include additional photographs of that same school event, we publish them on Flickr.

If I want tomorrow’s weather, or the local movie listings, or the stock market trends I find them all instantly on my I Phone.compare-iphone-3g-screen

If I want to read today’s edition of a credible newspaper that is simultaneously being read by people, literally, from around the world–  I download the NY Times onto my Kindle.

Now, don’t get me wrong… I’m not a techie or a gadget snob. I’m not even particularly computer savvy.  I just want the information I want.  And the morning newspaper has been replaced as a conduit for information, by tools that are faster, more portable, more accessible… more accurate. Five years ago most of these tools didn’t exist so I would go out of the house in the morning and pick up the paper and read it cover to cover.  If it was late or soaking wet from the sprinklers I would be pissed.   Now I don’t count on the newspaper as a source of reliable and real time information anymore so I don’t really care if it is late or wet or missing the sports page or written in Italian.   

Ironically, I pay for my annual newspaper subscription on-line, so it is kinda hard to cancel.  Out of sight out of mind.  Besides, I can’t bring myself to totally discontinue the service.  Even if I don’t read it.  I know it’s there on the driveway.  I know that the ink and the thin newsprint and the smell of the presses and the photos and the banner headlines are all good for something.   The morning newspaper is like an art project.  A slice of Americana. Nostalgia.  A link more to the past than to the current events that are so symmetrically displayed in shaded boxes and neat columns of formulaic print.

And it still does things my IPhone and Kindle and laptop can’t do:

newspaper hatFor example, we can still use it to line the parakeet cage or paint bookshelves on the garage floor.  We can use it to make paper mache Kachina dancers. We can recycle it. We can lay it down in the garden and fight off the weeds. We can make origami hats with it.  We can use it to pack up our glasses and dishes and move away. 

Newspaper publishers realize (I think) that their industry has not kept pace with the demands of consumers:  

The New York Times has had to sell part of its recently constructed headquarters, the Boston Globe is said to be worth barely 20 million dollars, the Rocky Mountain News has closed, the San Francisco Chronicle  could be next. The Philadelphia Inquirer, the Chicago Tribune and the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, have all filed for bankruptcy protection.  

The San Diego Union-Tribune, like other newspapers all across the country, has experience massive job losses and drastic cost cutting measures.  Meanwhile, universities report high interest in their Journalism Departments and Facebook welcomes 700,000 new users every day!

The morning paper hasn’t kept up with the news.

The conventional publishing industry sorts and packages the news and charges consumers for it as if it were a rare commodity– and that is not a game that is working anymore.  Like the auto industry and the railroads before it, the newspaper publishers now run their presses on borrowed time.  They are an anachronism in the age of technology;  a sacred cow gently grazing from room to room in a house of cards.  


cow news


Filed under technology in schools



blackberryTwitter the whales.  That’s what you do when they are left out of the curriculum. At least that is what connected parents are doing.

A recent Washington Post article described how tech-savvy parents across the country are forcing school boards and superintendents and principals to knuckle under to their avalanche of Twitters, texts, e-mails and blogs demanding their local flavor of change.  I read about it on Dangerously Irrelevant (one of my sources of professional reflection) and found the gleeful comments of fellow readers surprising.  As if school leaders don’t have enough of a mountain to climb now they have to brace for a Twitter campaign to deliver the community’s “no confidence” vote. The anonymous nature of these tools creates some real ethical challenges for school leaders pushing hard on organizational change. (How do most people respond to unsigned complaint letters?)  

The blog drew favorable comments from parents and university educators who seemed to regard this development as a final tipping point in finally straightening out those screwed up public schools.  I thought it was interesting for different reasons:  perhaps tech-savvy parents can now hold universities accountable too.

For better or worse our universities have long served as the R&D branch of public education. Published scholars in our post-secondary schools of education emerge as the industry experts. K-12 educators  worship at the altars of countless consultants and college professors and attribute the weight of the Gospel to their words.  And that would be ok if it wasn’t for the fact that when it actually comes to teaching and learning…  the very last place to go to find the expert practitioners of effective pedagogy would be a college classroom!

images1-2For example: this week I was asking Kira about her Marine Biology class. Although her college is 5 miles from the Pacific Ocean, they will not once visit the tidepools or watch the annual migration of the gray whales or stop by the Scripps Institute of Oceanography or even go to Sea World.  She has one class in a “lecture hall” where 150 students passively take notes from a “professor” inculcating his world view with the help of last year’s powerpoint.  Not very enlightened.  I wonder who I can Twitter about that.

Then Keenan has a class at San Diego State that requires students to go on-line for many of the lessons. It is very economical in that it saves everybody from having to show up for class… but adds to students’ stress (and expense) as they attempt to navigate the idiosyncrasies of another professor’s poorly designed website.  And what do they get when they finally break past the bonds of clumsy technology:  a talking-head video of– you guessed it– last year’s powerpoint.  Or text they could have just Googled.

sdsujpegAren’t these university professors–these giants of the trade–  reading their colleague’s stuff.  Marzano? Bloom?  Gardner? Freire? Cooperative learning? Gradual Release? Are you kidding me? Why aren’t they teaching each other?

An unfair generalization?  No doubt.  Of course there are extraordinary teachers in the university system and some schools have a lot more of them than others.  But if we are going to paint public education with such a broad brush at the K-12 level, it applies all the more in our universities in whom we trust the preparation of future teachers and leaders.  

The tail is wagging the dog. Americans intent on promoting school reform would do well to shift their gaze from the university system to the real experts in teaching and learning:  those high performing elementary school educators who engender extraordinary academic results in spite of challenging environmental factors, in spite of an upside down school system, in spite of the perception that public schools need to be “reformed”, and in spite of the continued reverence for bad teaching that is too often modeled by university-based “experts” that they turn to for answers.  The real experts, it seems, reside in places like El Milagro.


Maybe engaging all these parents and community-members who are technologically connected and bent on improving instruction in their children’s schools is not a bad idea. If it works at the local high school, surely it will work at the university too.

So let’s Twitter the school’s president and get Kira an audience with the great gray whales.


1 Comment

Filed under California charter schools, El Milagro, public education, Uncategorized